Bufford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bufford v. State

803 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 419, 2002 WL 80701

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1079·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Konduko T. Bufford, argues and the state properly concedes that his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense must be vacated where he was also convicted of robbery with a firearm arising from the same act. See Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991). See also Buffington v. State, 776 So.2d 960, 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Thompson v. State, 744 So.2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Cooper v. State, 727 So.2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the appellant’s conviction for unlawful [915] possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense be vacated.

Reversed with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Konduko T. Bufford, argues and the state properly concedes that his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense must be vacated where he was also convicted of robbery with a firearm arising from the same act. See Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991). See also Buffington v. State, 776 So.2d 960, 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Thompson v. State, 744 So.2d 527 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Cooper v. State, 727 So.2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that the appellant’s conviction for unlawful [915] possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense be vacated.

Reversed with directions.

Bufford v. State, 803 So. 2d 914, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 419, 2002 WL 80701 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

803 So. 2d 914 (Bufford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related