Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thompson v. State

840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 2003

DocketNo. 5D02-3098

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 840 So. 2d 352 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

The defendant seeks review of an order denying his motion to modify his community control and probation. The motion was addressed to the condition that the defendant visit his psychiatrist twice monthly and sought to reduce this requirement on the basis that it was no longer necessary. See § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2002). A trial court’s decision to reduce or ameliorate a lawful condition of community control or probation is entirely a matter of grace for which an appeal will not lie. Burgos v. State, 765 So.2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Langley v. State, 721 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLEUS, J.

The defendant seeks review of an order denying his motion to modify his community control and probation. The motion was addressed to the condition that the defendant visit his psychiatrist twice monthly and sought to reduce this requirement on the basis that it was no longer necessary. See § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2002). A trial court’s decision to reduce or ameliorate a lawful condition of community control or probation is entirely a matter of grace for which an appeal will not lie. Burgos v. State, 765 So.2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Langley v. State, 721 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack