Thompson v. Connick

578 F.3d 293, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17728, 2009 WL 2424566
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2009·No. 07-30443·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

By reason of an equally divided en banc court, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. The panel opinion was vacated by the grant of rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17728, 2009 WL 2424566 (5th Cir. 2009).

578 F.3d 293 (Thompson v. Connick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
S.D. Texas, 2026
Rangel v. WellPath, LLC
N.D. Texas, 2024
McNeal v. LeBlanc
93 F.4th 840 (Fifth Circuit, 2024)
Peggy Shumpert v. City of Tupelo, Mississip
905 F.3d 310 (Fifth Circuit, 2018)
Sanchez v. Gomez
283 F. Supp. 3d 524 (W.D. Texas, 2017)
Cindy Shadrick v. Hopkins Cnty., Kentucky
805 F.3d 724 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
George Rodriguez v. City of Houston
428 F. App'x 367 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
John Thompson v. Harry Connick
426 F. App'x 247 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
Connick v. Thompson
131 S. Ct. 1350 (Supreme Court, 2011)
Valle v. City of Houston
613 F.3d 536 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Comer v. Murphy Oil USA
607 F.3d 1049 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)
Constantino v. Michigan Department of State Police
707 F. Supp. 2d 724 (W.D. Michigan, 2010)
Hatchett v. City of Detroit
714 F. Supp. 2d 708 (E.D. Michigan, 2010)
Peterson v. City of Fort Worth, Tex.
588 F.3d 838 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Thompson v. Connick
578 F.3d 293 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)