Thompson v. Connick

Fifth Circuit

Thompson v. Connick

641 F.3d 133, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9758

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 13, 2011·No. No. 07-30443·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011).

Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This Court, sitting en banc, affirmed the judgment of the district court by reason of an equally divided vote. See Thompson v. Connick, 578 F.3d 293 (5th Cir.2009) (en banc). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded the judgment of this Court. See Connick v. Thompson, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011).

Accordingly, this matter is REMANDED to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of Appellants.

Thompson v. Connick, 641 F.3d 133, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9758 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

641 F.3d 133 (Thompson v. Connick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related