Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State

138 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 303
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 134 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1927·No. 18017·Published

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. The verdict was authorized by the evidence; and, the [770]*770finding of tlie jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Decided May 11, 1927. W. B. Cook, Franklin & Langdale, for plaintiff in error. R. G. Dickerson, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed. Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 138 S.E. 336, 36 Ga. App. 769, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 303 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

138 S.E. 336 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.