Thomas v. State

136 S.E. 92, 36 Ga. App. 214, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 879

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the evidence, while wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., conows. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.