Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

134 S.E. 188, 35 Ga. App. 402, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 399

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1926

Docket17280

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 188 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 134 S.E. 188, 35 Ga. App. 402, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 399 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged, while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

2. Ground 1 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, not having [403]*403been, approved by the trial court, can not be considered by this court. The remaining special grounds of the motion do not require a reversal of the judgment overruling the motion.

Decided May 12, 1926. Rehearing denied July 13, 1926. Hugh E. Gombs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Fells, solicitor-general, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., wnd Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI