Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

133 S.E. 268, 35 Ga. App. 347, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 718

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 134 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 12, 1926·No. 17068·Published

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

1. The venue was shown; the court did not err in any of its rulings on the admission of evidence; the trial judge, during the progress of the case, did not express or intimate his opinion as to what had or had not been proved, or as to the guilt of the accused; nor did the court err in recharging the jury.

2. There was evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and no error was committed when the motion for a new trial was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwoeth, J.

1. The venue was shown; the court did not err in any of its rulings on the admission of evidence; the trial judge, during the progress of the case, did not express or intimate his opinion as to what had or had not been proved, or as to the guilt of the accused; nor did the court err in recharging the jury.

2. There was evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and no error was committed when the motion for a new trial was overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Thomas v. State, 133 S.E. 268, 35 Ga. App. 347, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 718 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

133 S.E. 268 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.