Thomas v. State

137 S.E. 916, 36 Ga. App. 662, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 230
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 12, 1927
Docket17941
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 916 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 137 S.E. 916, 36 Ga. App. 662, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 230 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was not authorized by the evidence, and the refusal of the court to grant a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Hugh E. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 916, 36 Ga. App. 662, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-gactapp-1927.