Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

117 S.E. 775, 30 Ga. App. 260, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 378

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Ga. App. 38 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1923·No. 14323·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was accused and convicted of having and possessing intoxicating liquors. The evidence amply authorizes the defendant’s conviction, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge. The' several assignments of error attacking the charge of the court are without merit. The jury, as they had a right to do, believed the testimony offered to support the charge, and disbelieved the evidence offered by the defendant. It was not error for any reason assigned to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The defendant was accused and convicted of having and possessing intoxicating liquors. The evidence amply authorizes the defendant’s conviction, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge. The' several assignments of error attacking the charge of the court are without merit. The jury, as they had a right to do, believed the testimony offered to support the charge, and disbelieved the evidence offered by the defendant. It was not error for any reason assigned to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Thomas v. State, 117 S.E. 775, 30 Ga. App. 260, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 378 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

117 S.E. 775 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.