Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State

113 S.E. 97, 28 Ga. App. 784, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 858
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Ga. App. 38 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1922·No. 13585·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The conviction was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C, J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Hugh E. Combs, C. D. Colley, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Felts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 113 S.E. 97, 28 Ga. App. 784, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 858 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 97 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.