Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

111 S.E. 741, 28 Ga. App. 474, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 619

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1922

Docket13317

StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 741 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 111 S.E. 741, 28 Ga. App. 474, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Granting (but not deciding) that the court erred in not specifically passing on the exceptions to the answer of the judge of the county court, and on the demurrer to said exceptions, this was not such error as, under all the facts of the case, would require the grant of a new trial.

2. Under the judge’s answer to the writ of certiorari, there is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion to set aside the judgment which are embraced in the petition for certiorari, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overuling the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Granting (but not deciding) that the court erred in not specifically passing on the exceptions to the answer of the judge of the county court, and on the demurrer to said exceptions, this was not such error as, under all the facts of the case, would require the grant of a new trial.

2. Under the judge’s answer to the writ of certiorari, there is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion to set aside the judgment which are embraced in the petition for certiorari, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overuling the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 S.E. 741, 28 Ga. App. 474, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-gactapp-1922.