Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Thomas v. State

100 S.E. 760, 24 Ga. App. 350

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 4, 1919

Docket10819

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 760 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 100 S.E. 760, 24 Ga. App. 350 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Beoyles, C. J.

1. One who is present at a distillery when whisky is being manufactured, and who personally assists in the manufacture, is guilty of manufacturing whisky; and it is immaterial whether or not he owns the distillery, or whether or not he is hired to work thereat.

2. There is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; the defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beoyles, C. J.

1. One who is present at a distillery when whisky is being manufactured, and who personally assists in the manufacture, is guilty of manufacturing whisky; and it is immaterial whether or not he owns the distillery, or whether or not he is hired to work thereat.

2. There is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial; the defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence; and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 760, 24 Ga. App. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-gactapp-1919.