Blair v. State

7 S.E. 855, 81 Ga. 628
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 S.E. 855 (Blair v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blair v. State, 7 S.E. 855, 81 Ga. 628 (Ga. 1888).

Opinion

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

The statute (code, §4540a) makes no exception as to minors whose parents are dead, and who have no guardians. It was suggested in the brief of counsel that this minor was his own guardian. If that be true in a legal sense, and his own act as guardian would be equivalent to that of any other guardian, he should have given the liquor dealer authority in writing to furnish the forbidden beverage. Perhaps if he had taken time to prepare such a writing, he would have concluded not to make the purchase, and in this way the law and the public would have had the benefit of his deliberation; But, of course, the theory that ahoy is his own guardian is a mere legal conceit or fancy.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gary
101 S.W. 614 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 S.E. 855, 81 Ga. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blair-v-state-ga-1888.