Thomas v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thomas v. State

40 S.E. 735, 114 Ga. 543, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 717

DecidedFebruary 4, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 40 S.E. 735 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. State, 40 S.E. 735, 114 Ga. 543, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 717 (Ga. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

No evidence appears in the record which is sufficient to establish a legal conclusion that the plaintiff in error was guilty of the offense with which he was charged. Therefore a new trial should have been granted.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring.

Indictment for fornication. Before Judge Janes. Haralson superior court. December 19, 1901.

W. R. Hutcheson and 2?. S. <& E. E. Griffith, for plaintiff in error. W. T. Roberts, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI