State v. Gardner

1 Root 485
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1793·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

He cannot be admitted. In a prosecution against the wife, clearly he could not be a witness, and in testifying to the criminality of the prisoner he must necessarily testify to the criminality of his wife; further he may be interested in laying a foundation by his testimony, for a divorce.

A woman was then offered as a witness, who had been convicted before a justice for stealing some flour, was found guilty and adjudged to pay four shillings, the three-fold damages; the record was produced, and upon objection, was excluded as being infamous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gardner, 1 Root 485 (Colo. 1793).

1 Root 485 (State v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
41 S.E. 578 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Green v. Superior Court
21 P. 307 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Sylvester v. State
71 Ala. 17 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)
State v. Bridgman
49 Vt. 202 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1876)
Commonwealth v. Sparks
89 Mass. 534 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1863)
State v. Dudley
7 Wis. 664 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)
Lyford v. Farrar
31 N.H. 314 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1855)
State v. Welch
26 Me. 30 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1846)
Van Cort v. Van Cort
4 Edw. Ch. 621 (New York Court of Chancery, 1845)