Howard v. State
20 S.E. 426, 94 Ga. 587, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 192
Opinion
The only witness for the State was the husband of the woman with whom defendant was alleged to have committed the crime. It was objected that the witness was [588] incompetent to testify to a mime affecting his wife; and the objection was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard v. State, 20 S.E. 426, 94 Ga. 587, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 192 (Ga. 1894).
20 S.E. 426 (Howard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniels v. State
209 S.E.2d 72 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Ferguson v. Georgia
365 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 1961)
Peacon v. Peacon
30 S.E.2d 640 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Keltner v. State
1931 OK CR 406 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1931)
Faulkner v. State
160 S.E. 117 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Thompson v. Crawford
119 S.E. 440 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Smith v. State
81 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Rivers v. State
44 S.E. 859 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Thomas v. State
41 S.E. 578 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)