The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of California

Ninth Circuit

The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of California

208 F.3d 786

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2000

Docket97-15422

StatusPublished

This text of 208 F.3d 786 (The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of California, 208 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

208 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2000)

THE ASSOCIATION OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN EDUCATORS; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR ASIAN-PACIFIC BILINGUAL EDUCATION,on behalf of themselves, -Who their members, and all others similarly situated; OAKLAND ALLIANCE OF BLACK EDUCATORS, on behalf of themselves, their members, and all others similarly situated; SARA MACNEIL BOYD; SAM GENIS; TOUA YANG; BOB WILLIAMS;MARTA LECLAIRE; ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS; DIANA KWAN and AGNES HAYNES, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, ORDER
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 96-17131, 97-15422

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

March 27, 2000

Before: Hug, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

208 F.3d 786 (9th Cir. 2000)

THE ASSOCIATION OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN EDUCATORS; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR ASIAN-PACIFIC BILINGUAL EDUCATION,on behalf of themselves, -Who their members, and all others similarly situated; OAKLAND ALLIANCE OF BLACK EDUCATORS, on behalf of themselves, their members, and all others similarly situated; SARA MACNEIL BOYD; SAM GENIS; TOUA YANG; BOB WILLIAMS;MARTA LECLAIRE; ANTOINETTE WILLIAMS; DIANA KWAN and AGNES HAYNES, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, ORDER
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 96-17131, 97-15422

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

March 27, 2000

Before: Hug, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 F.3d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-association-of-mexican-american-educators-v-state-of-california-ca9-2000.