Terry v. Niblack
This text of Terry v. Niblack (Terry v. Niblack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED January 4, 1999 NOT FOR PUBLICATION Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk Filed: January 4, 1999
MICHELLE CREIGHTON TERRY, ) ) Appellee, ) ) ) DAVIDSON CIRCUIT Vs. ) ) No. 01-S-01-9709-CV-00180 ) GARY D. NIBLACK, M.D. and ) LABORATORY INVESTMENTS, ) INC., D/B/A GENE PROOF ) TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) Appellants. )
ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR
The appellants, Gary D. Niblack and Laboratory Investments, Inc., d/b/a
Gene Proof Technologies, have filed a Petition to Rehear issues raised in this
Court’s opinion issued on November 16, 1998. We have reviewed all of the
arguments raised in the petition, and we find them to be without merit.
Accordingly, after due consideration, it is ORDERED that the Petition to
Rehear is denied.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terry v. Niblack, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-niblack-tenn-1998.