Terry v. Niblack

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Terry v. Niblack. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Tenn. LEXIS 683
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1998·No. 01S01-9709-CV-00180·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE FILED January 4, 1999 NOT FOR PUBLICATION Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk Filed: January 4, 1999

MICHELLE CREIGHTON TERRY, ) ) Appellee, ) ) ) DAVIDSON CIRCUIT Vs. ) ) No. 01-S-01-9709-CV-00180 ) GARY D. NIBLACK, M.D. and ) LABORATORY INVESTMENTS, ) INC., D/B/A GENE PROOF ) TECHNOLOGIES, ) ) Appellants. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellants, Gary D. Niblack and Laboratory Investments, Inc., d/b/a

Gene Proof Technologies, have filed a Petition to Rehear issues raised in this

Court’s opinion issued on November 16, 1998. We have reviewed all of the

arguments raised in the petition, and we find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, after due consideration, it is ORDERED that the Petition to

Rehear is denied.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry v. Niblack, (Tenn. 1998).

Terry v. Niblack (Terry v. Niblack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.