Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State

840 So. 2d 371, 2003 WL 1087945
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2003·No. 1D02-2664·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

840 So.2d 371 (2003)

John D. TAYLOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1D02-2664.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 2003.

*372 Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Karen M. Holland, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We affirm the appellant's revocation of probation and imposition of judgment and sentence. However, because the written order of revocation of probation does not conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. Cozart v. State, 823 So.2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. State, 840 So. 2d 371, 2003 WL 1087945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

840 So. 2d 371 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lizotte v. State
950 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Burns v. State
909 So. 2d 398 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Tomlin v. State
898 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Gonzalez v. State
849 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)