Taylor v. State
769 So. 2d 529, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13840, 2000 WL 1595731
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 2000·No. No. 5D98-2215·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon remand of this appeal to this court for further consideration based on the Supreme Court of Florida’s opinion in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we ordered further briefing to determine the merits of the unpreserved sentencing error raised on appeal. The state candidly con[530]*530cedes that the probationary term imposed after violation of probation exceeds the five-year statutory maximum. Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for correction of the sentence.
Sentence VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. State, 769 So. 2d 529, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13840, 2000 WL 1595731 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
769 So. 2d 529 (Taylor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
769 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)