Tomlin v. State

898 So. 2d 275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4958, 2005 WL 831353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 2005·No. No. 1D03-3410·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Glynell Tomlin appeals from the revocation of his probation. He contends the revocation was not supported by the great[276]*276er weight of the evidence, and the written revocation order does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. We affirm the revocation, but remand for correction of the written order. See Koch v. State, 888 So.2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Taylor v. State, 840 So.2d 371, 372 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Williams v. State, 886 So.2d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Turner v. State, 873 So.2d 480, 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ERVIN, DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tomlin v. State, 898 So. 2d 275, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4958, 2005 WL 831353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

898 So. 2d 275 (Tomlin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koch v. State
888 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Turner v. State
873 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Taylor v. State
840 So. 2d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Williams v. State
886 So. 2d 1078 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)