Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Turner v. State

Turner v. State

866 So. 2d 1250, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2004 WL 384479
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-2711
StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 1250 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Turner v. State, 866 So. 2d 1250, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2004 WL 384479 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of postconviction relief is affirmed because the motion is facially insufficient. The motion failed to allege with sufficient specificity the substance of the witnesses’ testimony or explain how the omission of the evidence prejudiced the trial. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140, 1142 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(6). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant filing, within 30 days of the issuance of the mandate, a motion that complies with the requirements of Catis.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catis v. State
741 So. 2d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 1250, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1325, 2004 WL 384479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.