Williams v. State
This text of 888 So. 2d 755 (Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Charles Williams, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LEVY, GODERICH, and GREEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the lower court's denial of appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As we recently held in Burgal v. State, No. 3D03-3016, 888 So.2d 702, 2004 WL 2601148 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov.17, 2004), Blakely does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
888 So. 2d 755, 2004 WL 2889870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.