Leonard v. State

892 So. 2d 1235, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2524, 2005 WL 475209
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 2005
DocketNo. 3D04-2508
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 892 So. 2d 1235 (Leonard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard v. State, 892 So. 2d 1235, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2524, 2005 WL 475209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[1236]*1236 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc is treated as having included a motion for rehearing. The appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied. See Williams v. State, 888 So.2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Hughes v. State, 826 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes v. State
901 So. 2d 837 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 So. 2d 1235, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2524, 2005 WL 475209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.