Tapia v. United States
178 L. Ed. 2d 744, 131 S. Ct. 975, 562 U.S. 1132, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 428, 79 U.S.L.W. 3398
This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 744 (Tapia v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Tapia v. United States, 178 L. Ed. 2d 744, 131 S. Ct. 975, 562 U.S. 1132, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 428, 79 U.S.L.W. 3398 (U.S. 2011).
Opinion
Stephanos Bibas, Esquire, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the position that 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a) allows district courts to consider rehabilitative need in setting the length and term of imprisonment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment
18 U.S.C. § 3582(a)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 744, 131 S. Ct. 975, 562 U.S. 1132, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 428, 79 U.S.L.W. 3398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tapia-v-united-states-scotus-2011.