Succession of Davis
This text of 85 So. 2d 886 (Succession of Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by Mrs. Winnie D. . Wood, Mrs. Nora D. Dourbourg and Mrs. Irene Keller from a judgment rendered against them in the Succession of John H. Davis.
Neither appellant's nor their counsel appeared on the day set for argument of the appeal in this Court, nor was a brief filed in support of the appeal. Under these circumstances, it is the settled jurisprudence that the appeal will be dismissed. Harvey v. Thomas, 227 La. 25, 78 So.2d 497; Mendes v. Kostmayer, 226 La. 730, 77 So.2d 21; Williams v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co., Inc., 226 La. 848, 77 So.2d 416; Di Martino v. O’Brien, 225 La. 329, 72 So.2d 749; Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803; Henderson v. Life & Cas. Ins. Co. of Tennessee, 222 La. 175, 62 So.2d 264; Nungesser v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc., 220 La. 277, 56 So.2d 422; Core Bros. v. F. J. J. Sloat Dredging Co., 220 La. 169, 55 So.2d 904, and authorities therein cited; Chatelain v. Besnard, 219 La. 488, 53 So.2d 243; Bailey v. Bowans, 219 La. 471, 53 So.2d 237.
It is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 So. 2d 886, 229 La. 314, 1956 La. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-davis-la-1956.