Couvillion v. Payne
This text of 103 So. 2d 524 (Couvillion v. Payne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant made no appearance either in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument nor has he filed a brief in support of his appeal. The appeal is presumed, therefore, to have been abandoned and it will, accordingly, be dismissed. Succession of Davis, 229 La. 314, 85 So.2d 886; Juneau v. Juneau, 227 La. 921, 80 So. 2d 864; Harvey v. Thomas, 227 La. 25, 78 So.2d 497; Williams v. Southern Advance [525]*525Bag & Paper Co., 226 La. 848, 77 So.2d 416; Mendes v. Kostmayer, 226 La. 730, 77 So.2d 21; Falcon v. Falcon, 224 La. 938, 71 So.2d 334; Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803; Wadsworth v. Demarco, La.App., 86 So.2d 212; Mitchell v. Martin, La.App., 86 So.2d 211; Pharis v. Jowers, La.App., 85 So.2d 389; Johnson v. Montgomery, La.App., 84 So.2d 213; Normand v. Avoyelles Parish School Board, La.App., 11 So.2d 713.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 So. 2d 524, 1958 La. App. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/couvillion-v-payne-lactapp-1958.