Mitchell v. Martin
86 So. 2d 211, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 643
Opinion
No appearance has been made before this Court on behalf of defendant-appellant, either by brief or in person. It is therefore presumed • that the appeal has been abandoned, and it will accordingly be dismissed, Falcon v. Falcon, 224 La. 938, 71 So.2d 334; Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803; Bains v. Kenneson, La.App. 1 Cir., 16 So.2d 555; Succession of James, 1 Cir., 1 La.App. 354; Johnson v. Montgomery, La.App. 2 Cir., 84 So.2d 213; see Grandmougin v. Green, 1 Cir., 17 La.App. 49, 135 So. 259.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Martin, 86 So. 2d 211, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 643 (La. Ct. App. 1956).
86 So. 2d 211 (Mitchell v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen v. Cuba
125 So. 2d 429 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Rich Plan of Central Louisiana, Inc. v. Hawthorne
124 So. 2d 350 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rester
118 So. 2d 515 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Davidson's Cab Co. v. Boatner
110 So. 2d 212 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1959)
Couvillion v. Payne
103 So. 2d 524 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1958)