Rich Plan of Central Louisiana, Inc. v. Hawthorne

124 So. 2d 350, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1167
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 17, 1960·No. No. 145·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

The appellant did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, nor was any brief filed on his behalf. The appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and it will accordingly be dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal. See also: Wyatt v. Wyatt, 232 La. 467, 94 So.2d 439; Brumfield v. Giles, 231 La. 85, 90 So.2d 786, 787; Daunis v. Maryland Cas. Co., La.App. 2 Cir., 115 So.2d 225; Mitchell v. Martin, La.App. 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 211; Pharis v. Jowers, La.App. 2 Cir., 85 So.2d 389.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rich Plan of Central Louisiana, Inc. v. Hawthorne, 124 So. 2d 350, 1960 La. App. LEXIS 1167 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

124 So. 2d 350 (Rich Plan of Central Louisiana, Inc. v. Hawthorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Cuba
125 So. 2d 429 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)