Mendes v. Kostmayer
77 So. 2d 21, 226 La. 730, 1954 La. LEXIS 1377
Opinion
The presumption is that this appeal has been abandoned, the appellant (Roy G. Mendes), when the case was called for argument, having failed to appear personally or through counsel and having omitted to favor us with a brief in support of his demands. Therefore, it must and will be dismissed. See Core Brothers v. F. J. J. Sloat Dredging Company, 220 La. 169, 55 So.2d 904, Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803, and the numerous cases therein cited. • -
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendes v. Kostmayer, 77 So. 2d 21, 226 La. 730, 1954 La. LEXIS 1377 (La. 1954).
77 So. 2d 21 (Mendes v. Kostmayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stelly Construction, Inc. v. Richard
401 So. 2d 1211 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
Walker v. Jones
221 So. 2d 44 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)
Couvillion v. Payne
103 So. 2d 524 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1958)
Benedict v. Stulb
89 So. 2d 768 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Succession of Davis
85 So. 2d 886 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)