Mendes v. Kostmayer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Mendes v. Kostmayer

77 So. 2d 21, 226 La. 730, 1954 La. LEXIS 1377

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 13, 1954

DocketNo. 39949

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 77 So. 2d 21 (Mendes v. Kostmayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendes v. Kostmayer, 77 So. 2d 21, 226 La. 730, 1954 La. LEXIS 1377 (La. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

HAMITER, Justice.

The presumption is that this appeal has been abandoned, the appellant (Roy G. Mendes), when the case was called for argument, having failed to appear personally or through counsel and having omitted to favor us with a brief in support of his demands. Therefore, it must and will be dismissed. See Core Brothers v. F. J. J. Sloat Dredging Company, 220 La. 169, 55 So.2d 904, Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803, and the numerous cases therein cited. • -

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAMITER, Justice.

The presumption is that this appeal has been abandoned, the appellant (Roy G. Mendes), when the case was called for argument, having failed to appear personally or through counsel and having omitted to favor us with a brief in support of his demands. Therefore, it must and will be dismissed. See Core Brothers v. F. J. J. Sloat Dredging Company, 220 La. 169, 55 So.2d 904, Peace v. Love, 223 La. 772, 66 So.2d 803, and the numerous cases therein cited. • -

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 So. 2d 21, 226 La. 730, 1954 La. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendes-v-kostmayer-la-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack