Henderson v. Life & Cas. Ins.

62 So. 2d 264, 222 La. 175, 1952 La. LEXIS 1321
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 15, 1952·No. No. 38039·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MOISE, Justice.

On the day set for hearing of this appeal, we received telegraphic information, from counsel for plaintiff to the effect that he was submitting this matter to this Court on the record, without oral argument or-brief.

We cannot consider this appeal, since-plaintiff appellant’s counsel neither appeared in court to argue the demand nor-filed a brief in support of his cause. Nungesser v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc., 220 La. 277, 56 So.2d 422; White v. Sharp, 220 La. 928, 57 So.2d 898; Frey v. Ingram, 219 La. 159, 52 So.2d 531; Bailey v. Bowans, 219 La. 471, 53 So.2d 237 and Chatelain v. Besnard, 219 La. 488, 53 So.2d 243.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal! is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henderson v. Life & Cas. Ins., 62 So. 2d 264, 222 La. 175, 1952 La. LEXIS 1321 (La. 1952).

62 So. 2d 264 (Henderson v. Life & Cas. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of Davis
85 So. 2d 886 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Di Martino v. O'Brien
72 So. 2d 749 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
Falcon v. Falcon
71 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)