Stupak-Thrall v. United States

89 F.3d 1269, 1996 WL 408698
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 23, 1996·No. No. 94-1863·Published·Cited by 34 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The en banc court is equally divided in this case. Seven members favor affirmance of the judgment of the District Court, and seven favor reversal. Hence, as is customary under such circumstances, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided vote.

The mandate will not issue for fourteen (14) days from the date of this order so that members of the court may file any separate opinions they wish to.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stupak-Thrall v. United States, 89 F.3d 1269, 1996 WL 408698 (6th Cir. 1996).

89 F.3d 1269 (Stupak-Thrall v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. Merrick B. Garland
19 F.4th 890 (Sixth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Gibson
874 F.3d 544 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Ray Gibson
Sixth Circuit, 2017
David Herr v. United States Forest Serv.
865 F.3d 351 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
Wyoming v. United States Department of Agriculture
661 F.3d 1209 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Gabrion
Sixth Circuit, 2008
United States v. Tylan Lucas
Eighth Circuit, 2007
United States v. Lucas
499 F.3d 769 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Jeffrey Goodwin v. Margarette Ghee
330 F.3d 446 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Marchwinski v. Howard
60 F. App'x 601 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. McFarland
281 F.3d 506 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
United States v. James McFarland Jr.
311 F.3d 376 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United States
45 Fed. Cl. 21 (Federal Claims, 1999)