Marchwinski v. Howard
319 F.3d 258, 2003 WL 202350
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2003·No. No. 00-2115·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
[259] ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellant and appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 17, 2003.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Marchwinski v. Howard, 319 F.3d 258, 2003 WL 202350 (6th Cir. 2003).
319 F.3d 258 (Marchwinski v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lebron v. Wilkins
820 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (M.D. Florida, 2011)
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNIT. AUTO., AERO. v. Winters
278 F. Supp. 2d 880 (W.D. Michigan, 2003)
INTERN. UNION, UNITED AUTO., AEROSPACE v. Winters
336 F. Supp. 2d 686 (W.D. Michigan, 2003)
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Winters
336 F. Supp. 2d 686 (W.D. Michigan, 2003)
Marchwinski v. Howard
319 F.3d 258 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)