Marchwinski v. Howard

Sixth Circuit

Marchwinski v. Howard

319 F.3d 258, 2003 WL 202350

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 2003

DocketNo. 00-2115

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 319 F.3d 258 (Marchwinski v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marchwinski v. Howard, 319 F.3d 258, 2003 WL 202350 (6th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[259]*259ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant and appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 17, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI