Stokes v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.3d 724
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided October 7, 2021·No. 235, 2021·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WALTER STOKES, § § Defendant Below, § No. 235, 2021 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 76000001D1 (N) Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: August 23, 2021 Decided: October 7, 2021

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion

to affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment below should

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the Superior Court’s July

12, 2021 order denying the appellant’s motion for correction of an illegal sentence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stokes v. State, (Del. 2021).

Stokes v. State (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.