Stokes v. State
This text of Stokes v. State (Stokes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WALTER STOKES, § § Defendant Below, § No. 104, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 76000001DI (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: April 8, 20191 Decided: May 9, 2019
Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s
motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below
should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated February 14, 2019,
denying the appellant’s motion for correction of sentence.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
1 The motion to affirm was filed on March 22, 2019, but the record was filed on April 8, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stokes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stokes-v-state-del-2019.