Stokes v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stokes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.3d 724
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided May 9, 2019·No. 104, 2019·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WALTER STOKES, § § Defendant Below, § No. 104, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 76000001DI (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: April 8, 20191 Decided: May 9, 2019

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below

should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated February 14, 2019,

denying the appellant’s motion for correction of sentence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

1 The motion to affirm was filed on March 22, 2019, but the record was filed on April 8, 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stokes v. State, (Del. 2019).

Stokes v. State (Stokes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.