Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Stephens v. State

Stephens v. State

168 S.E.2d 333, 119 Ga. App. 674, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1209
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1969
Docket44321
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 168 S.E.2d 333 (Stephens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. State, 168 S.E.2d 333, 119 Ga. App. 674, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1209 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinions

Pannell, Judge.

The three appellants were convicted of violations of the game laws of this State. After announcing ready for trial and after the jury was impaneled and sworn, the defendants made a motion to suppress certain evidence. The trial judge had a hearing thereon and overruled the motion. A transcript of the evidence adduced on the motion, held outside the presence of a jury, is the only transcript sent to this court. This transcript is certified by the reporter a,s the only portion requested by the appellants. The certificate of the clerk to this transcript indicates that there is no additional transcript on file in his office. There being no transcript of the evidence adduced upon the trial, we can not determine whether the evidence sought to be suppressed was actually introduced before the jury, and unless it was introduced, the overruling of the motion to suppress the evidence was harmless, even if error. Under these circumstances, the case must be affirmed as to the alleged error in suppressing the evidence and as to the alleged error that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. See Bass v. State, 117 Ga. App. 89 (159 SE2d 299).

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur. [675]*675Submitted March 3, 1969 Decided April 16, 1969 Rehearing denied May 14, 1969. Allyn M. Wallace, for appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pittman v. State
650 S.E.2d 302 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Pierson v. State
406 S.E.2d 578 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
State v. Romero
660 P.2d 715 (Utah Supreme Court, 1983)
Brackins v. State
224 S.E.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Wright v. State
196 S.E.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Gilliam v. State
184 S.E.2d 360 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
Garrett v. State
171 S.E.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Stephens v. Lindsey
304 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Georgia, 1969)
Stephens v. State
168 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E.2d 333, 119 Ga. App. 674, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-state-gactapp-1969.