Pierson v. State
Opinion
After a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of driving under] the influence. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sen-j tence entered on the trial court’s finding of guilt.
Appellant’s enumerations of error relate only to the denial of hii pre-trial motion to suppress and only a transcript of the hearing o: that motion has been included in the record on appeal. “There bein; no transcript of the evidence adduced upon the [bench] trial, we ca: not determine whether the evidence sought to be suppressed was ac tually introduced . . . , and unless it was introduced, the overrulin¡ of the motion to suppress the evidence was harmless, even if erro: Under these circumstances, the case must be affirmed as to the all [635] leged error in [not] suppresing the evidence. . . . [Cit.]” Stephens v. State, 119 Ga. App. 674 (168 SE2d 333) (1969). See also Gilliam v. State, 124 Ga. App. 493 (184 SE2d 360) (1971).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
406 S.E.2d 578 (Pierson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.