Wright v. State
This text of 196 S.E.2d 484 (Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
None of the alleged errors can be determined without reference to the transcript of evidence and proceedings; and since appellant designated in his notice of appeal that the transcript would not be filed for inclusion in the record, and that the clerk was to omit the transcript from the record on appeal, and no transcript has been sent up, the judgment is affirmed. See, e. g., Clark v. State, 219 Ga. 680 (2) (135 SE2d 270); Brown v. State, 223 Ga. 540 (2) (156 SE2d 454); Smith v. Smith, 223 Ga. 795 (2) (158 SE2d 679); Delta Corp. of America v. Aiken, 224 Ga. 241 (161 SE2d 293); Terry v. Warner Robins Supply Co., 225 Ga. 5 (2) (165 SE2d 731); Nichols v. Love, 227 Ga. 659 (2) (182 SE2d 439) and cits.; Davis v. State, 117 Ga. App. 359 (160 SE2d 839) and cits.; Hill v. State, 119 Ga. App. 612 (2) (168 SE2d 327); Stephens v. State, 119 Ga. App. 674 (168 SE2d 333); Law v. State, 121 Ga. App. 106, 108 (173 [319]*319SE2d 98) and cits.; Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Williamson, 124 Ga. App. 549 (2) (184 SE2d 665).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E.2d 484, 128 Ga. App. 318, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wright-v-state-gactapp-1973.