State v. Wright

381 S.W.3d 405, 2012 WL 5200090, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 909
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 23, 2012·No. No. WD 74251·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Tiffany Wright appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting her of the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance after a bench trial. Wright claims that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress and in admitting over her subsequent trial objections to incriminating evidence seized from her by police officers. Wright claims that the police officers did not have a reasonable suspicion to stop her as they relied upon an unsubstantiated anonymous tip, and that her stop was therefore unlawful, rendering evidence seized from her unlawful in violation of her rights to due process of law, a fair trial, and to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 381 S.W.3d 405, 2012 WL 5200090, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1354 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 405 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.