State v. Wright
Opinion
ORDER
Eric Mario Wright (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 2000,1 and one count of kidnapping in facilitation of a felony, in violation of Section 565.110, for which Defendant was sentenced to con-secutives terms of twelve years and five years imprisonment, respectively. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
413 S.W.3d 731 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.