State v. Wright

381 S.W.3d 394, 2012 WL 4883140, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 909
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 96772·Published

Opinion

[395]*395 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Shante Wright appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him as a persistent drug offender and as a prior and persistent offender of second degree trafficking.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 381 S.W.3d 394, 2012 WL 4883140, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 394 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.