State v. Wright

318 S.W.3d 786, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1126, 2010 WL 3394663
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 367
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·No. WD 71548, WD 71549·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Brian S. Wright appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Bates County in which he was found guilty of sexual abuse, section 566.100, RSMo 2000, and false imprisonment, section 565.130, RSMo 2000; and sentenced to six years imprisonment and one year in county jail, to run concurrently. On appeal, Wright presents four points, in which he argues that: (1) the State did not have sufficient evidence to prove the “forcible compulsion” element of sexual abuse; (2) the State did not have sufficient evidence to prove that he knowingly restrained the victim; (3) the State should not have been allowed to introduce evidence of his prior adjudications and allegations of stalking; and (4) the testimony of the victim was so inherently contradictory as to be objectively unreasonable. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Wright, 318 S.W.3d 786, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1126, 2010 WL 3394663 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 786 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.