State v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Wright

276 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1099, 2009 WL 486001

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·No. ED 91053·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Carrell Lamark Wright, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Carrell Lamark Wright, appeals from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Wright, 276 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1099, 2009 WL 486001 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

276 S.W.3d 909 (State v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related