State v. Gates

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Gates

276 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1096, 2009 WL 486071

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

DocketED 90804

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 S.W.3d 909 (State v. Gates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Gates, 276 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1096, 2009 WL 486071 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Gates appeals from his judgment of conviction of and sentence for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Johnnie Gates appeals from his judgment of conviction of and sentence for first-degree assault and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1096, 2009 WL 486071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gates-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack