State v. Williams

285 S.W.3d 427, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2009 WL 1664704
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 239
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 2009·No. ED 91248·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Williams appeals from the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000; one count of attempted first-degree statutory sodomy, Section 566.062, RSMo 2000; one count of first-degree child molestation, Section 566.067, RSMo 2000; one count of sexual misconduct involving a child (indecent exposure), Section 566.083, RSMo 2000; and one count of attempted victim tampering, Section 575.270, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b). We deny all pending motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 285 S.W.3d 427, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 816, 2009 WL 1664704 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

285 S.W.3d 427 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freshley v. O'Gorman
285 S.W.3d 427 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)