Freshley v. O'Gorman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freshley v. O'Gorman

285 S.W.3d 427, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 814, 2009 WL 1664715

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 16, 2009

DocketED 91408

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 S.W.3d 427 (Freshley v. O'Gorman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freshley v. O'Gorman, 285 S.W.3d 427, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 814, 2009 WL 1664715 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from that part of a judgment denying relief on plaintiffs fraudulent misrepresentation claim. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a written memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI