State v. Williams

255 S.W.3d 536, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 811, 2008 WL 2421088
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 2008·No. ED 89964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Williams (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of section 571.030, RSMo 2000. 1 Appellant was sentenced to three years imprisonment, which the trial *537 court suspended, placing Appellant on probation for two years. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 255 S.W.3d 536, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 811, 2008 WL 2421088 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

255 S.W.3d 536 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliot v. State
255 S.W.3d 536 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)