State v. Williams

209 S.W.3d 10, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1603, 2006 WL 3069516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1824
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 2006·No. No. ED 86751·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Williams (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for attempted statutory rape in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. Defendant contends in his sole point on appeal that there is insufficient evidence to support a conviction for attempted statutory rape under Section 564.011.1 In his sole point on appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for acquittal at the close of the evidence because there was insufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could have found Defendant guilty of attempted statutory rape.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Williams, 209 S.W.3d 10, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1603, 2006 WL 3069516 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

209 S.W.3d 10 (State v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.